Are Perceived Organizational Support and Flexible Working Arrangement Able to Influence Employee Engagement among Millennials?

Dody Pratama Marumpe *

Department of Management, The Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.

Titik Rosnani

Department of Management, The Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.

Heriyadi

Department of Management, The Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.

Yulyanti Fahruna

Department of Management, The Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.

Arman Jaya

Department of Management, The Faculty of Economics & Business, Universitas Tanjungpura, Pontianak, Indonesia.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Aims: This study aims to find out the influence of Perceived Organizational and Flexible Working Arrangements on Employee Engagement among millennials while Work/Life Balance is an intervening variable.

Study Design: This study used quantitative methods. The data was collected using an online questionnaire. This study involved Millennials as a sample with 151 respondents who came from various kinds of companies.

Place and Duration of Study: The study was taken place at Palopo, South Sulawesi. This study was conducted between March and May 2018.

Methodology: This study involved 151 respondents and was conducted in Palopo. The respondents came from various companies and institutions such as Government-owned companies, Banking companies, Private companies, Educational institutions, Finance companies, Insurance companies, etc.

Results: Hypothesis 1, Perceived Organizational Support on Work/Life Balance produces T statistics values of 5.630 with a probability of 0.000. The test results show that the probability <alpha (5%). It means that there is a significant direct influence of Perceived Organizational Support on Work/life Balance. Hypothesis 2, the influence of a Flexible Working Arrangement on Work/Life Balance generates a T statistics value of 3.678 with a probability of 0.000. The test results show that the probability <alpha (5%). It means that there is a significant direct influence of Flexible Working Arrangements on Work/Life Balance. Hypothesis 3, the influence of Work/Life Balance on Employee Engagement. generate T statistics values of 5.924 with a probability of 0.000. The test results show that the probability <alpha (5%). It means that there is a significant direct influence of Work/Life Balance on Employee Engagement. Hypothesis 4, the influence of Perceived Organizational Support on Employee Engagement mediated by Work/life Balance generates in indirect influence coefficient direct influence coefficient It means that there is a significant influence of Perceived Organizational Support on Employee Engagement through Work/life Balance. Hypothesis 5, the influence of the Flexible Working Arrangement on Employee Engagement mediated by Work/life Balance generates in indirect influence coefficient direct influence coefficient. It means that there is a significant influence on the Flexible Working Arrangement of Employee Engagement through Work/life Balance.

Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that; 1). Perceived Organizational Support and Flexible Working Arrangements have a positive and significant influence on Work/Life Balance, 2). Work/life Balance has a positive and significant influence on Employee Engagement 3). Perceived Organizational Support and Flexible Working Arrangement have positive and significant influence on Employee Engagement with Work / life balance as a mediating variable.

Keywords: Perceived organizational support, flexible working arrangement, work/life balance, employee engagement


How to Cite

Marumpe , Dody Pratama, Titik Rosnani, Heriyadi, Yulyanti Fahruna, and Arman Jaya. 2023. “Are Perceived Organizational Support and Flexible Working Arrangement Able to Influence Employee Engagement Among Millennials?”. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 23 (11):28-44. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2023/v23i11976.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.