Digital Curriculum Model for MBKM Program towards Job Readiness of Generation Z Facing the Industrial Era 4.0
Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting,
Page 155-161
DOI:
10.9734/ajeba/2022/v22i23860
Abstract
Aims: This research is to find out which of the eight MBKM programs is the most effective in preparing students for the world of work in industry 4.0.
Study Design: This research model seeks to find out what actually happens in the natural context when the program is still running, to improve its quality presently and in the future.
Place and Duration of Study: Primary data sources were accessed through in-depth observations and interviews with final semester students of public and private universities in the Semarang City area for four (4) months (April - July 2022).
Methodology: This study uses a qualitative descriptive method that applies a formative evaluation research. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling, with criteria that have A accreditation (6 public and private universities) and have run several MBKM programs.
Results: A review of the research results show that the impact of the implementation of the MBKM Learning Program is represented through readiness to participate in learning activities outside the study program. This readiness is triggered by the awareness of the importance of the program to equip oneself. Increased competence – attitudes, skills, and knowledge – is felt through improving and strengthening English language skills, digital literacy, and digital engineering. In addition, off-campus learning activities offer so many supporting skills from the specific skills that exist in the field.
Conclusion: Although the students considered the MBKM program to be important and useful, the form of activity that was followed was more dominant in apprenticeships. A student exchange, humanitarian action, and five other activities have not received more attention. This fact initiates further research to find out the problems behind the student's actions.
Keywords:
- Digital curriculum
- MBKM
- generation Z
- work industry
How to Cite
References
(unuja.ac.id)
Rusman. Curriculum Management, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2018;30.
Oemar H. Curriculum development management, Jakarta: Rosda karya youth and graduate school of the Indonesian University of Education. 2009;1.
Rusman. Curriculum management, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2018;3.
Junaid R, Baharuddin MR. Improving teacher pedagogic competence through PKM lesson study. To Maega: Journal of Community Service. 2020; 3(2):122-129.
Arifin S, Muslim MOH. The challenge of implementing the "freedom of learning, independent campus" policy at private Islamic Universities in Indonesia. Al-Ilmi Journal of Islamic Education. 2020;3(1).
Widiyono A, Irfana S, Firdausia K. Implementation of independent learning through campus teaching pioneers in elementary schools. Didactic Method: Journal of Elementary Education. 2021;16(2).
Medeka Learning Guidebook – Merdeka Campus Director General of Higher Education, Ministry of Education and Culture; 2020.
Bencsik A, Juhász T, Horváth-Csikós G. Y And Z generations at workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness. 2016;6(3): 90-106.
Available:https://Doi.Org/10.7441/Joc.2016.03.06
Abdullah QA, Humaidi N, Shahrom M. Industry revolution 4.0: The readiness of graduates of higher education institutions for fulfilling job demands. Romanian Journal of Information Technology and Automatic Control. 2020;30(2):15-26.
Hejase HJ, Rkein HI, Fayyad-Kazan HF. COVID-19 boosts the need for new competencies for accountancy knowledge workers. Strategies Account Manag. 2021;2(2):1-6. SIAM. 000535.
Rkein H, Issa ZA, Awada FJ, Hejase HJ. Does automation of the accounting profession Affect employability? an exploratory research from lebanon. Open Journal of Business and Management. 2020;8:175-193.
Available:https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2020.81011
Nugrahani F, Hum M. Qualitative research methods. Solo: Cakra Books; 2014.
Accessed 07 July 2022.
Available:http://digilibfkip.univetbantara.ac.id/material/Buku.pdf
Rahma PA, Suhartadi S, Nauri I, Irdianto W, Mindarta E. Causal factors analysis unsynchronized occupation with the competency during the Study; 2019.
Available:https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-7- 2019.2288594
Hejase HJ, Chehimi GM. Preparing the Instructor’s Teaching &Learning Competencies. Conference: Training of New Instructors in Teaching & Learning. July 23, 2021. Al Maaref University, Beirut, Lebanon.
Accessed 20 August 2022
Available:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353402251_Preparing_the_Instructor's_Teaching_Learning_Competencies
Chehabeddine K, Hejase HJ. Educational Technology E-learning. Conference: Special Topics Class Presentation. May 26, 2018. Vini International, Saudi Arabia & Al Maaref University, Beirut, Lebanon.
DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.32849.84323
Caena F, Redecker C. Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st-century challenges: The case for the european digital competence framework for educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education. 2019;54(3):356-369.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Mustika IG. Effectiveness of online learning in Covid 19 situations. CETTA: Journal of Educational Sciences. 2020; 3(3).
Andriani T. Information and communication technology based learning system. Socio-Cultural Journal. 2015;12(1).
Syamsuar, Reflianto. Technology-Based education and learning challenges in the industrial revolution 4.0 Era. E-TECH: Scientific Journal of Educational Technology. 2018;6(2).
Available:https://doi.org/10.24036/et.v2i2.101343
Chehimi GM. Chatting on-line: An assessment of bilingualism and the social contexts of language in lebanon. English Linguistics Research. 2021;10(3):8-40.
DOI:10.5430/elr.v10n3p8 Available:https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v10n3p8
Schulz B. The importance of soft skills: Education beyond academic knowledge; 2008.
Accessed 07 July 2022.
Available:https://ir.nust.na/handle/10628/39
-
Abstract View: 78 times
PDF Download: 44 times
