Is Living in Mwanza Region More Economically Better and Happier than Living in Kagera Region? Finite Mixture (FIMIX) Approach
Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting,
The study aimed to uncover the unobserved heterogeneity of the population in Mwanza and Kagera regions. The study examined if living in Mwanza region is more economically better and happier than living in Kagera region. The cross-sectional survey research used with the cross-sectional data from 211 individuals sampled randomly from 4 districts, Nyamagana and Misungwi from Mwanza region, and Bukoba and Muleba from Kagera region. The FIMIX-PLS used to analyse the data. The study found that the population of Mwanza and Kagera regions can be grouped into two mains classes which are class one with a lower annualised income below 1.5 TZS millions per capita and a lower mean score of fundamental psychological factors for happiness (FPFH) in comparing to the class two. The class two is characterised with a higher annualised income about 2.45 TZS millions per capita and a higher mean score of FPFH in comparing to class one. The study evidenced that respondents of Mwanza region have a higher annualised income and FPFH scores than respondents of Kagera region in each class. Therefore, the study concluded that living in Mwanza region is more economically better and happier than living in Kagera region. The study recommended the immigration to seek the economic opportunity and happiness, for example immigration from Kagera region to Mwanza region or nation to nation is encouraged. Moreover, further study recommended by using a panel data to attest the posed facts because this study limited to the cross-sectional data.
- economic growth
- factors of happiness (FPFH)
- hand individual income
How to Cite
URT (United Republic of Tanzania. Kagera region investment guide. Presidential Office’s Regional Administration and Local Government, Kagera, Tanzania; 2019c.
URT (United Republic of Tanzania). National accounts statistics of Tanzania mainland 2012-2018, 1stEdition, in revised GDP series base 2015. National Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Finance and Planning, Dodoma. Tanzania; 2019b.
URT (United Republic of Tanzania). National accounts statistics, Popular Version 2018.National Bureau of Statistics, Dodoma. Tanzania; 2019a.
Easterlin RA. Does money buy happiness? The public interest. 1973;30(winter):3-10.
Easterlin RA. Paradox lost? Review of Behavioural Economics. 2017;4(4):311–339.
Roka D. Nexus of economic growth on happiness and inequality: Re-examine the paradox. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting. 2020;15(1):35-49.
Semeijn JH, van der Heijden BIJM, De Beuckelaer A. Personality traits and types in relation to career success an empirical comparison using the big five. Applied Psychology An International Review. 2020;69(2):538–556.
Meyer N, Hamilton L. Female entrepreneurs business training and its effect on various entrepreneurial factors. Evidence from a Developing Country. International Journal of Economic and Finance Studies. 2020;12(1):135 -151.
Li L, Shi L. Economic growth and subjective well-being: Analyzing the formative mechanism of Easterlin paradox. The Journal of Chinese Sociology. 2019;6(1):1-19.
Stevenson B, Wolfers J. Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 2008;1:1–87.
Stevenson B, Wolfers J. Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? American Economic Review. 2013;103(3):598–604.
Stoop N, Leibbrandt M, Zizzamia R. Exploring psychological well-being and poverty dynamics in South-Africa evidence from NIDS waves 1-5. Cape Town SALDRU, UCT, (SALDRU Working Paper Number 240 Version 1/ NIDS Discussion Paper 2019/7); 2019.
Bundala NN. Structural modelling of psychological limiting factors for economic growth. South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics. 2020;8(4):104-117.
Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Mattews LM, Ringle CM. Identifying and treating unobserved heterogeneity with FIMIX-PLS: Part 1-Method. European Business Review. 2016;28(1):63-76.
Hahn C, Johnson MD, Herrmann A, Huber F. Capturing customer heterogeneity using a finite mixture PLS approach. SAP AG, Neurottstrabe, Germany; 2002.
Bozdogan H, Sclove SL. Multi-sample cluster analysis using Akaike’s information criterion, in: Annals of the institute of statistical mathematics. 1984;36:163-180.
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 7th Ed. Pearson Education, Inc: USA; 2019.
Ghauri P, Grønhaug K, Strange R. Research Methods in Business Studies, 5thEd.). Cambridge, University Press, London, UK; 2020.
Kothari CR. Research methodology methods and techniques, (2nd Ed.) new age international publishers. New Delhi; 2009
Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A. Research method for business students, (3rdEdition). New York Prentice Hall; 2009.
Dijkstra TK, Henseler J. Consistent partial least squares path modelling. MIS Quarterly. 2015;39(2):297-316.
Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review. 2019;31(1):2-24.
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics R. The use of partial least squares path modelling in international marketing. Advanced International Marketing. 2009;20: 277–319.
Schoemaker PJ. Experiments on decision under risk: The expected utility Hypothesis, 1st Edition, Springer Science, Business Media Dordrecht, Chicago; 1980.
Everett T, Ishwaran M, Ansaloni GP, Rubin A. Economic growth and the environment, MPRA paper 23585, University Library of Munich, Germany; 2010.
Kuznets S. Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review. 1955; 49:1-28.
Malcolm P, Nicholas R. Mathematics for economists: An introductory textbook. Oxford University Press; 2015.
Abstract View: 62 times
PDF Download: 85 times