Academic Fraud in Online System during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Lampung - Indonesia

Main Article Content

Fajar Purwatmiasih
. Sudrajat
Reni Oktavia

Abstract

This study aims to find indications of academic fraud in the implementation of final semester assessment online from the perspective of diamond fraud theory consisting of four dimensions; pressure, opportunity, rationalization, and capability. This quantitative study with a questionnaire created with Microsoft Form to collect the required data. This research was conducted in Lampung Tengah on December 14, 2020, from 07.30 to 15.00 WIB using the Microsoft Form questionnaire. The number of samples in this study was 81. Respondents in this study were 3 vocational high school students in Lampung Tengah Regency who participated in the final semester assessment online. The data obtained is processed using the line analysis method with Smart PLS 3.3.2 software. The results showed that pressures and opportunities have no significant effect on academic cheating in the implementation of final semester assessment online. While rationalization and positive ability have a significant effect on academic cheating in the assessment of the final semester online. In addition to the impact of academic fraud, the results of this study provide solutions to reduce the occurrence of academic fraud in Vocational High School students conducted online.

Keywords:
Academic fraud, capability diamond fraud, online learning, opportunity, pressure, rationalization.

Article Details

How to Cite
Purwatmiasih, F., Sudrajat, ., & Oktavia, R. (2021). Academic Fraud in Online System during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Lampung - Indonesia. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 21(2), 34-52. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2021/v21i230349
Section
Original Research Article

References

Amanda G. Manfaat penggunaan teknologi untuk pendidikan; 2020.
Available://https_republika.co.id/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepublika.co.id%2Fberita%2Fqjj68s423%2Fmanfaat-penggunaan-teknologi-untuk-pendidikan
Accessed Jan. 27, 2021.

Kemdikbud, Pelaksanaan kebijakan pendidikan dalam masa darurat penyebaran coronavirus disease (COVID- 19). Kemdikbud; 2020.

Apriani N, Sujana E, Sulindawati IGE. Pengaruh pressure, opportunity, dan rationalization terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik, e-journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 2017;7(1):12,

Sasongko N, Noor Hasyim M, Fernandez D. Analysis of behavioral factors that cause student academic fraud, TJSSR. 2019;53:830–837.
DOI: 10.32861/jssr.53.830.837

Indonesia P. Undang-undang republik indonesia nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang sistem Pendidikan Nasional; 2003. Available:http://lppks.kemdikbud.go.id/uploads/pengumuman/uu_no_20_tahun_2003.pdf.

Albrecht W, Sack R. Accounting education: Charting the course through a perilous future, Accounting Education Series. 2000;16.

Nahar HS. Exploring future accountants’ academic fraud (in)tolerance: Oman evidence, JAEE. 2018;8;1:66–83.
DOI: 10.1108/JAEE-04-2017-0050.

Susanti S, Lestari D. The influence of pressure, opportunity and rationalization on academic fraud of vocational student, ujer. 2019;7(9):1976–1982.
DOI: 10.13189/ujer.2019.070918

Triyadi B. Kasus Luis Suarez Mencontek saat Ujian Bahasa Italia Diselidiki FIGC; 2020. Available:https://www.liputan6.com/bola/read/4364318/kasus-luis-suarez-mencontek-saat-ujian-bahasa-italia-diselidiki-figc
Accessed Dec. 14, 2020.

Kaltsum U. Calon guru ketahuan mencontek dengan tulis jawaban di kuteks; 2020. Available:https://www.liputan6.com/citizen6/read/4342146/calon-guru-ketahuan-mencontek-dengan-tulis-jawaban-di-kuteks.

Liputan6. Sejumlah Siswa Tertangkap Mencontek; 2012.
Available:https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/389459/sejumlah-siswa-tertangkap-mencontek.

Utami I, Wijono S, Noviyanti S, Mohamed N. Fraud diamond, Machiavellianism and fraud intention, IJOES. 2019;35;4:531–544.
DOI: 10.1108/IJOES-02-2019-0042.

White A. May you live in interesting times: A reflection on academic integrity and accounting assessment during COVID19 and online learning, Accounting Research Journal, vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print; 2020,
DOI: 10.1108/ARJ-09-2020-0317.

Munirah A, Nurkhin A. Pengaruh faktor-faktor fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap kecurangan akademik. Economic Education Analysis Journal. 2018;20.

Fransiska IS, Utami H, Perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa: perspektif fraud diamond theory, Journal Akuntansi Aktual. 2019;6;2:8.

Murdiansyah I, Sudarma M, Nurkholis. Pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik (Studi Empiris Pada Mahasiswa Magister Akuntansi Universitas Brawijaya), Journal Akuntansi Aktual. 2017;4;2:13,

Nurkhin A, Fachrurrozie F. Analisis pengaruh dimensi fraud diamond terhadap perilaku kecurangan akademik mahasiswa pendidikan akuntansi UNNES, liabilities. J Pendidik. Akunt. 2018;1;1:1–12.
DOI: 10.30596/liabilities.v1i1.2026.

Lanier MM. Academic Integrity and distance learning, Journal of Criminal Justice Education. 2006;17;2:244–261.
DOI: 10.1080/10511250600866166.

Singleton TW, Singleton AJ. Fraud auditing and forensic accounting, fourth. wiley corporate F & A; 2010.

Santoso D, Yanti HB. Pengaruh perilaku tidak jujur dan kompetensi moral terhadap kecurangan akademik (Academic Fraud) Mahasiswa Akuntansi, J. Akunt N A. 2016;3;1:57.
DOI: 10.25105/jat.v3i1.4915

Nasional MP, Peraturan menteri pendidikan nasional nomor 17 tahun 2010 tentang pencegahan dan penaggulangan plagiat di perguruan tinggi; 2020.

Indonesia P. Undang-undang republik ndonesia nomor 19 tahun 2002 tentang hak cipta; 2002.

Free C. Looking through the fraud triangle: a review and call for new directions, Meditari Accountancy Research. 2015;23;2:175–196.
DOI: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2015-0009

Ruankaew T. Beyond the fraud diamond, International Journal of Business Management and Economic Research (IJBMER). 2016;7;(1):474–476.

Fuad K, Lestari AB, Handayani RT. Fraud pentagon as a measurement tool for detecting financial statements fraud, y Atlantis Press SARL. 2020;115:85–88.

Hidajat T. Rural banks fraud: a story from Indonesia, JFC. 2020;27;3:933–943.
DOI: 10.1108/JFC-01-2020-0010.

Romney MB, Steinbart PJ. Sistem informasi akuntansi, in Salemba Empat, Jakarta, 13th ed. 2015;1;149, 151, G-31.

Bicer AA. An empirical analysis on students’ cheating behavior and personality traits in the context of fraud triangle factors, in contemporary issues in audit management and forensic accounting, Grima S, Boztepe E, Baldacchino PJ, Eds. Emerald Publishing Limited. 2020;102:1–10.

Wolfe DT, Hermanson DR. The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud, The CPA Journal. 2004;74(12):38–42.6,

Kazemian S, Said J, Hady Nia E, Vakilifard H. Examining fraud risk factors on asset misappropriation: Evidence from the Iranian banking industry, JFC. 2019;26;2:447–463.
DOI:10.1108/JFC-01-2018-0008

Avortri C, Agbanyo R. Determinants of management fraud in the banking sector of Ghana: The perspective of the diamond fraud theory, JFC, vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print; 2020.
DOI: 10.1108/JFC-06-2020-0102

Rahmatika DN, Kartikasari MD, Dewi Indriasih D, Sari IA, Mulia A. Detection of fraudulent financial statement; can perspective of fraud diamond theory be applied to property, real estate, and building construction companies in Indonesia?, European Journal of Business and Management Research. 2019;4;6:1–9.
DOI: 10.24018/ejbmr.2019.4.6.139.

Lokanan M, Sharma S. A fraud triagle analisis of the libor fraud, Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting. 2018;10;2:187–212.

Christian N, Basri YZ, Arafah W. Analysis of fraud triangle, fraud diamond and fraud pentagon theory to detecting corporate fraud in indonesia, The International Journal of Business Management and Technology. 2019;3;4:73–78,.

Newton D. Another problem with shifting education online: A rise in cheating; 2020. Available:https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/another-problem-with-shifting-education-online-a-rise-in-cheating/2020/08/07/1284c9f6-d762-11ea-aff6-220dd3a14741_story.html (accessed Dec. 27, 2020)

Prasastie A, Gamayuni RR. Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan perspektif fraud diamond (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Lq-45 Yang Terdaftar Di BEI Tahun 2009-2013), Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan. 2015;20;1:16.

Lorensa CN. et al. Pengaruh budaya organisasi dan peran auditor internal terhadap pencegahan fraud, Jurnal Akuntansi & Keuangan Daerah. 2018;13;2:13–25.

Abdullahi R, Mansor N. Fraud triangle theory and fraud diamond theory. Understanding the convergent and divergent for future research, IJARAFMS. 2015;5;4:38-45.
DOI: 10.6007/IJARAFMS/v5-i4/1823

Bolin A. Self-Control, Perceived Opportunity, and Attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty, The Journal of Psychology. 2004;138: 101–14.
DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.138.2.101-114.

Sadikin A, Hamidah A. Pembelajaran daring di tengah wabah COVID-19, BIO. 2020;6;2:109–119.
DOI: 10.22437/bio.v6i2.9759.

Ferismayanti, Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Online Akibat Pandemi Covid-19; 2020.
Available:https://lpmplampung.kemdikbud.go.id/detailpost/meningkatkan-motivasi-belajar-siswa-pada-pembelajaran-online-akibat-pandemi-covid-19

Guru A. Pembelajaran Daring dan Luring: Pengertian, Ciri-ciri, Serta Perbedaannya; 2020. Available:https://www.amongguru.com/pembelajaran-daring-dan-luring-pengertian-ciri-ciri-serta-perbedaannya/

Sekaran U, Bougie R. Metode Penelitian untuk Bisnis, 6th ed. Salemba Empat; 2017.

Pratiwi Y. Cara meningkatkan motivasi belajar siswa pada pembelajaran daring akibat pandemi COVID-19; 2020.
Available:https://www.kompasiana.com/allah1/5f398f85097f36743c66a9f2/cara-meningkatkan-motivasi-belajar-siswa-pada-pembelajaran-daring-akibat-pandemi-covid-19.