Main Article Content
This paper addresses a gap in the literature by presenting novel empirical insight, accorded by privileged access to prejudications and legal decisions, into corporate governance in China. A main aim of our work was to assess whether calls for reform of the regulatory system are warranted. We present an inductive piece of research into two-tier boards in Chinese listed companies, incorporating a board of directors and a supervisory board, appointed by and reporting to the shareholders’ meeting. Through unique primary-source evidence, and additional evidence from recent legal cases, we illustrate the problems faced by organizations that have had to contend with the inherent difficulties of corporate governance in China. Our findings suggest that the supervisory board, in practice, has limited power, given the conflicting roles of the various members, and that corporate governance might be better maintained by a greater transfer of power to independent directors.
Tian X. Analysis of the functions of supervisory board system in modern Chinese companies. International Journal of Law and Management. 2009;51(3):153-168.
Xi C. In search of an effective monitoring board model: board reforms and the political economy of corporate law in China. Connecticut Journal of International Law. 2006;22:1-46.
Tam OK. Models of corporate governance for Chinese companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2000;8(1):52-64.
Tian L. State shareholding and the value of China's firms. In EFA;2001
Dahya J, Karbhari Y, Xiao JZ, Yang M. The usefulness of the supervisory board report in China. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 2003;11(4):308- 321.
Ji J, Talavera O, Yin S. Frequencies of board meetings on various topics and corporate governance: Evidence from China. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2019;1-42.
China Securities Regulatory Commission. The guidelines to build independent director system in listed companies, Beijing; 2001.
OECD. Corporate Governance of listed companies in China: Self-assessment by the China securities regulatory commission. OECD Publishing; 2011. Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119208-en Retrieved on December 15, 2016.
Ding S, Wu Z, Li Y, Jia C. Can the Chinese two-tier-board system control the board chair pay?. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting. 2009;1(1).
Gul FA, Kim JB, Qiu AA. Ownership concentration, foreign shareholding, audit quality, and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics. 2010;95(3);425-442.
Goergen M. nternational corporate governance. London: Pearson; 2012.
Xu H, Lin J. Do the characteristics of independent directors and supervisory board members matter in China?. Business and Management Studies. 2016; 2(3):27-43.
Donaldson L, Davis JH. Boards and company performance‐research challenges the conventional wisdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 1994;2(3):151-160.
Turnbull S. Corporate governance: Its scope, concerns and theories. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 1994;5(4):180-205.
Schneider-Lenne ER. Corporate governance in Germany. Oxford Economics Policy. 1992;8(3):11-23.
Jungmann C. The effectiveness of corporate governance in one-tier and two-tier board systems–Evidence from the UK and Germany–. European Company and Financial Law Review. 2006;3(4):426-474.
Yuan P, Liu SY, Gao F. A study on board of directors, supervisory boards and corporate performance of Chinese Listed Companies. Finance Research. 2006;6: 23-32.
Chen G, Firth M, Gao DN, Rui OM. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2006;12(3):424-448.
Firth M, Fung PM, Rui OM. Ownership, two-tier board structure, and the informativeness of earnings–Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 2007;26(4):463-496.
Jiaguo L, Qian T, Mi L, Yun X. An empirical study on the independence of supervisory board of Chinese listed company: A PLS approach. In Artificial Intelligence and Computational Intelligence (AICI), 2010 International Conference on, IEEE. 2010;2:374-378.
Cao ZF. Governance structure of listed companies in China. Doctoral Paper, Hunan, Hunan Normal University; 2009.
Ding GC. A Study on the System of Supervisory Boards Based on Stakeholders. Journal of AnHui university: Philosophy and Social Sciences. 2007; 31(3):132-136.
Mei SS. The theory of modern corporation institution authority structure. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press; 2000.
Wang SH, Ning T, Zhao Z. Empirical Research on the Supervising Board Governance of Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Hebei University. 2009;4:61-65.
Yang JC. The integration and improvement of the supervisory board system and independent director system in Chinese listed companies. Doctoral Paper, Shanghai, East China University of Political Science and Law; 2016.
Zhou M. The Latest Development of Supervisory Board System in Germany and Its Enlightenment to China. Chinese and German Law Conference. 2009;7:102.
Goodall K, Warner M. Corporate governance in Sino-Foreign joint ventures in the PRC: The view of Chinese directors. Journal of General Management. 2002; 27(3):77-92.
Liao L, Lin TP, Zhang Y. Corporate board and corporate social responsibility assurance: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 2018;150(1):211-225. McCracken G. The long interview. Sage. 1988;13.
Chen CH, Al-Najjar B. The determinants of board size and independence: Evidence from China. International Business Review. 2012;21(5):831-846.
Globerman S, Peng MW, Shapiro DM. Corporate governance and asian companies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2011;28(1):1-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9240-6
Wu Z, Li Y, Ding Y, Jia C. Supervisory board and financial risk-taking: Behaviors in Chinese listed companies. In R.W. Kolb and D. Schwartz (Eds.), Corporate Boards: Managers of Risk, Sources of Risk, Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
Chen VZ, Li J, Shapiro DM. Are OECD-prescribed "good corporate governance practices" really good in an emerging economy? Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2011;28(1):115-138. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9206-8
Mutlu CC, Van Essen M, Peng MW, Saleh SF, Duran P. Corporate Governance in China: A Meta‐Analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 2018;55(6):943-979.
Xiao JZ, Dahya J, Lin Z. A grounded theory exposition of the role of the supervisory board in China. British Journal of Management. 2004;15(1):39-55.
Hu HW. Tam OK, Tan MG. Internal governance mechanisms and firm performance in china. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2010;27(4):727-749. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9135-6
Ryan B, Scapens RW, Theobald M. Research method and methodology in finance and accounting; 2002.
Chua WF. Radical developments in accounting thought. Accounting Review. 1986;601-632.
Morgan G. Accounting as reality construction: Towards a new epistemology for accounting practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1988;13(5): 477-485.
Morgan G, Smircich L. The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review. 1980;5(4):491-500.
Shan YG, McIver RP. Corporate governance mechanisms and financial performance in China: Panel data evidence on listed non financial companies. Asia Pacific Business Review. 2011;17(3): 301-324.
Filatotchev I, Yung-Chih Lien, Piesse J. Corporate governance and performance in publicly listed, family-controlled firms: Evidence from Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 2005;22(3):257. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10490-005-3569-2
Durocher S. The future of interpretive accounting research: The contribution of McCracken's (1988) approach. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 2009;6(3):137-159.
Yiu DW, Wan WP, Xu Y. Alternative Governance and Corporate Financial Fraud in Transition Economies: Evidence From China. Journal of Management; 2018.