On the Determinants of Economic Openness in Nigeria

Main Article Content

Charles Okechukwu Aronu
Lucky Oghenechovwe Arhovwon
John Obatarhe Emunefe
Godspower Onyekachukwu Ekwueme
Nkechi Udochukwu Otty

Abstract

Aims: Economic openness has been identified as a tool that provides countries with an avenue to explore advances on technology, creation of exchanges through the reallocation of resources especially from less efficient to efficient producer, and economic growth. This study examined the short-run and long-run impact of economic determinants such as foreign direct investment, unemployment rate and percentage of the urban population on economic openness in Nigeria. 

Place and Duration of Study: The study employed a secondary source of data collection obtained from the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), Statistical Bulletin and National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) Annual Publication. The data comprises of variables such as economic openness which is proxy by trade openness, foreign direct investment, unemployment rate and percentage of the urban population from 2006 - 2019.

Methodology: The impacts of the economic determinants considered in this study were examined using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) co-integration technique and the error correction parameterization of the ARDL model. The R-3.6.3 programming package was used to perform the analysis.

Results: The outcome of the study revealed that the appropriate ARDL model for estimating economic openness was the ARDL (1,1,1,1) selected based on the Schwarz Bayesian Criterion. Also, the error correction model identified the sizable speed of adjustment by 30.0% of disequilibrium correction yearly for reaching the long-run equilibrium steady-state position. It was found that the lag of the Unemployment Rate (UNER) and the percentage of the urban population have a significant short-term effect on economic openness. Also, the distribution of economic openness was found to be stable over the observed period. Also, it was found that the relationship amongst the variables was independent except for the relationship between the percentage of the Urban Population (PUP) and Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) which was found to be is unidirectional.

Conclusion: The outcome of this study suggested the urgent need for policymakers to implement policies such as the "ease of doing business"  of the federal government of Nigeria which is anticipated to make foreign direct investment more attractive and in turn is expected to boost economic growth and thereby impact positively on urbanization in Nigeria.

Keywords:
ARDL model, co-integration, error correction, economic openness, unemployment rate

Article Details

How to Cite
Aronu, C. O., Arhovwon, L. O., Emunefe, J. O., Ekwueme, G. O., & Otty, N. U. (2020). On the Determinants of Economic Openness in Nigeria. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 18(3), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2020/v18i330287
Section
Original Research Article

References

Mbogela CS. An Empirical study on the determinants of trade openness in the African economies. Advances in Management & Applied Economics. 2019; 9(3):9-42.

Al-Edary ADM, Al-Shamri MS. The Impact of economic openness degree on GDP growth in Malaysia and some neighboring countries for the period 1990-2010. International Journal of Education and Research. 2013;1(4):1-22.

Adhikary BK. FDI, Trade openness, capital formation, and economic growth in Bangladesh: A linkage analysis. International Journal of Business and Management. 2011;6(1):16-28.

Dao AT. Trade openness and economic growth. Mark A. Israel '91 Endowed Summer Research Fund in Economics. 2014;2.

Available:http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/israel_economics/2

Khalid MA, Khalid H, Ali A. Investigation of the relationship between trade openness and economic growth in the case of China. International Journal of Research – Granthaalayah. 2017;5(7):199-213.

Available:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.836438

Siyakiya P. Can trade openness stimulate output performance? A case of selected African countries. Journal of International and Global Economic Studies. 2017;10(2): 55-67.

Marelli E, Signorelli M. China and India: Openness, trade and effects on economic growth. European Journal of Comparative Economics. 2011;8:129-154.

Gwartney J, Skipton C, Lawson R. Trade openness, income levels, and economic growth, 1980 - 1998. Economic freedom of the World: 2001 Annual Report; 2001.

Rose AK. Do WTO members have more liberal trade policy? Journal of International Economics. 2004;63:209-235.

Melitz MJ, Ottaviano GI. Market size, trade, and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies. 2008;75(1): 295-316.

Baharom AH, Habibullah MS, Royfaizal RC, RC. The relationship between trade openness, foreign direct investment and growth: Case of Malaysia. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 2008;1-10.

Available:https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11928/ MPRA Paper No. 11928, posted 04 Dec 2008 15:47 UTC

Keho Y. The impact of trade openness on economic growth: The case of Cote d’Ivoire. Cogent Economics & Finance. 2017;5:1332820

Available:https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1332820

Tahir M, Hasnu SAF, Estrada MR. Macroeconomic determinants of trade openness: Empirical investigation of SAARC region. Journal of Asia Business Studies. 2018;12(2):151-161.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1108/ JABS-12-2015-0207

Kwofie C, Ansah RK. A study of the effect of inflation and exchange rate on stock market returns in Ghana. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences, Article ID 7016792. 2018;8.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7016792

Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 1969;37(3):424–438.
DOI: 10.2307/1912791

Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of long run relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 2001;16(3):289-326.
Available:https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616 2001