Main Article Content
Local councils in every part of Cameroon are playing an extremely significant role in the provision of essential public services. However, the local development authorities face tremendous challenges to adequately generate finances to meet community needs. The aim of this paper is to find out whether the councils in the Fako Division have access to all the sources of finance as stipulated by statute and to determine the difficulties they face in exploiting the sources to finance their developmental plans. The exploratory and descriptive designs were adopted for the study. 4 out of the 6 councils in the Fako Division were conveniently selected. The Finance and General Affaires Officers were purposely designated as the respondents for the study. Data were collected with the aid of semi-structured questionnaires and a checklist. The collected data were descriptively analysed with the use of tables and bar charts. Mean and the Relative Important index were used to rank in terms of importance the challenges faced by the councils in the revenue generation process and the options available to them to exploit. The findings reveal that the councils have access to internal sources such as; local taxes; fees, fines, and penalties; service charges, patents and business licenses; Gifts and donations. The external sources were mostly Intergovernmental transfers and Council Development Funds from FEICOM and PNDP. The study equally found out that the most exploited options of finance by the councils are INTERCOM (M =4.25, RII = 0.85, ranked 1st) and service charge adjustment (M = 4.13, RII = 0.82, ranked 2nd) while the least utilized options were tax adjustment (Mean = 1.00, RII = 0.02, ranked 10th) and the usage of saved up profit from investments and businesses (M = 1.75, RII = 0.35, ranked 9th). The study further uncovered that the challenges with the highest mean scores are infringement by the central government on means of internal revenue generation of the municipality (M = 3.85, SD = 1.214) and lack of power to make finance bi laws (M = 3.85, SD = 1.214), while inadequate sources of revenue (M = 3.42, SD = 1.306) and narrow local tax base (M = 3.42, SD = 1.306) had the least mean scores. The study recommends among others that the framework in place needs clarification to clear off conflicting and confusing goals. It should include legislative clarification of the responsibilities of each level of government and the identification of the appropriate funding resources. These will reduce vertical imbalances and increase fiscal responsibility. Also, a transfer system should be defined that encourages local governments to collect own revenue and manage their roles efficiently, while imposing strict budget constraints to foster fiscal discipline. This will minimize conflicting responsibilities and enable the local governments to discharge their functions.
Masaki, Takaaki. The impact of intergovernmental grants on local revenues in Africa: Evidence from Tanzania. Department of Government, Cornell University; 2015.
Fjeldstad OH, Chambas G, Brun JF. Local government taxation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review and an agenda for research; 2014.
Sekula A. Does system of local government subsidisation fulfil revenue equalisation function? Evidence from Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana. 2017;8(4):523-535.
DOI: https://doi. org/10.24136/oc.v8i4.32
Subdei S. Fiscal decentralization and municipal taxation in Nepal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences of Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu; 2013.
Bartle JR, Kriz KA, Morozov AB. Local government revenue structure: Trends and challenges. Journal of Public Budgeting and Financial Management. 2011;23(2): 268-287.
UNCDF, FMDV, RIAFCO. Studies on financial resource sustainability and diversification for Local Government Financing Institutions in Africa: Cross-cutting summary of studies on FEICOM (Cameroon), FDL (Madagascar), ANICT (Mali) and ANFICT (Niger); 2018.
World Bank. Cameroon - path to fiscal decentralization. Opportunities and challenges. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management. Africa Region. World Bank; 2012.
Cameroon-Report. Cameroon: Decentralisation on the Move; 2017.
LGCDP. Status report of local governance and community development programme (16 July 2008 – 15 July 2011). Kathmandu: Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development; 2011.
International Monetary Fund. Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative and Multilateral Debt Releive Initiative; 2016.
World Bank. The world bank hipc initiative, relieving the world's poorest countries of unmanageable debt burden. World Bank; 2012.
Zumegah EJ. Impacts of fiscal decentralization on local economic development in Ghana. Case study of Ketu-South Municipal Assembly; 2015.
Gohnchu CH. Resource mobilization by local councils in Cameroon: A case study of local councils in the Fako Division, Southwest Region. Pan African Institute for Development, West Africa., Development Studies. Buea: PAID-WA; 2015.
Kalla S. New limbe one council building to cost 559 million fcfa. Cameroon News Agency. Retrieved; 2017.
Ischa M, Tamini J, Assanga C, Sylla A. Cameroon: Strategic planning and monitoring of municipal development. Bamako: Communicances; 2007.
Hobdari N, Nguyen V, Dell'Erba S, Ruggiero E. Lessons for effective fiscal decentralization in Sub-Saharan Africa; 2018. ISBN/ISSN: 9781484358269/2616-5333.
Samuelson P. The pure theory of the public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics. 1954;36(4).
Musgrave Richard A, Peggy B. Musgrave. Public Finance in Theory and Practice, 5th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill; 1987.
Bird RM, Ebel RD, Wallich CI. Decentralization of the Socialist State. Washington D.C.: World Bank; 1995.
Thiessen U. Fiscal decentralization and economic growth in high-income OECD Countries, Economics Working Papers 001. European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes; 2001.
Akai N, Sakata M. Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. Journal of Urban Economics. 2002;52:93–108.
Bojanic A. The impact of fiscal decentralization on growth, inflation and inequality in the Americas. CEPAL Rev. 2018;124:57–77.
Kyriacou A, Muinelo-Gallo L, Roca-Sagalés O. Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance. Papers in Regional Science. 2015;94:89–107.
Blöchliger H, Égert B. Decentralisation and economic growth. Part 2: Decentralisation and its impact on economic activity, productivity and investment. OECD Working Papers on Fiscal Federalism, No. 16, OECD Publishing; 2013.
Sacchi A, Salotti S. How regional inequality affects fiscal decentralisation: Accounting for sub-central governments autonomy. Environment & Planning C: Policy & Government. 2014;32(1):144-162.
Smoke Paul. Financing urban and local development: The missing link in sustainable development finance. Position Paper Produced in Collaboration with the Global Taskforce of Local and Regional Governments; 2015.
Olofin SO, Olubusoye OE, Bello AK, Salisu AA, lalekan AO. A fiscal federalism in Nigeria: A cluster analysis of revenue allocation to states and local government areas, 1999-2008. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics. 2008;3(1):65-83.
Murana AO. Local government finance in Nigeria: A case study of Iwo local government area of Osun State. International Journal of Politics and Good Governance. 2015;VI(6.1).
Caldeira E, Foucault M, Rota-Graziosi G. Does decentralization facilitate access to poverty related services? Evidence from Benin, NBER Working Papers 18118, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc; 2012.
Fjeldstad OH, Merima A, Katera L. Policy implementation under stress: Central-local government relations in property tax collection in Tanzania; 2018.
Amusa H, Mabugu R. The contribution of fiscal decentralization to regional inequality: Empirical results. Economic Research Southern Africa; 2016.
Igbinosa E. Empirical analysis of the effects of taxes on economic growth in Nigeria. World Journal of Finance and Investment Research. 2016;1(1).
Afuberoh D, Okoye E. The impact of taxation on revenue generation in Nigeria: A study of federal capital territory and the selected states. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research (IJPAMR). 2014;2(2):22-47.
Olasunkanmi O, Banna S, Kazeem O, Bukola B. Revenue generation in Lagelu Local Government Area of Oyo State: A correlate of tax mobilization and utilization. Canadian Social Sciences; 2019.
Martinez L. Sources of revenue and government performance: Evidence from Colombia; 2019.
Ambe Kingsley Ndonwi. The tax regime in Cameroon and the responsibilities of Cameroonians towards fiscal tax allocation; 2019.
Jenkins J. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology. 1983;9:527-553.
McCarthy J, Zald M. Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. The American Journal of Sociology. 1987;82(6):1212–1241.
Beuchler S. Beyond resource mobilization? Emerging trends in social movement theory. In: Social Movements: Perspectives and Issues. Ed. S. M. Buechler and F. K. Cylke. 1997. Mayfield Publishing Company, Mountain View, California. 1995;19 –210.
Pfeffer J, Salancik G. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford Business Books, Stanford, CA; 2003.
Gulati R, Sytch M. Dependence asymmetry and joint dependence in inter organizational relationships: Effects of embeddedness on a manufacturer’s performance in procurement relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2007;52(1):32-69.