Empirical Evidence on the Validity of the Unconditional Higher Moment CAPM in the Bombay Stock Exchange

Akash Asthana

Department of Statistics, University of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow-226007, India.

Syed Shafi Ahmed *

Department of Statistics, University of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow-226007, India.

Anjana Tiwari

Department of Statistics, University of Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow-226007, India.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

The traditional Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumed a normal distribution of returns, which was criticized by various researchers who recognized the non-normal distribution of returns in the Sharpe-Lintner CAPM. The introduction of unconditional higher moments, namely co-skewness and co-kurtosis, as additional measures of systematic risk may enhance the model's explanatory power, especially when the distribution function of stock returns is asymmetric. The present study empirically investigates the applicability of unconditional higher order moment CAPM and the impact of higher moments in the Indian stock market i.e. Bombay Stock Exchange using the data of sectoral indices for the period from April 2011 to March 2021. To test the four moment CAPM empirically, the specification given by Fang and Lai has been used in the study. The findings of the present study revealed that the higher moments (coskewness and cokurtosis) are significantly priced and have impact on the returns in the Indian stock market. The market risk premium for covariance was found to be insignificant. Further the hypothesis related to intercept term was accepted and market risk premiums were rejected. The results showed an increase in the explanatory power of the model as compared to the unconditional CAPM as the R-square value of the model was obtained better than the latter model. The mixed and inconclusive findings contradicted the model in the Indian context. The alternate models like the Fama-French three factor and five factor model should be exploited in the Indian context as those models have been rarely used in the Indian context.

Keywords: Covariance, coskewness, cokurtosis, Indian stock market, Bombay stock exchange (BSE)


How to Cite

Asthana, A., Ahmed, S. S., & Tiwari, A. (2024). Empirical Evidence on the Validity of the Unconditional Higher Moment CAPM in the Bombay Stock Exchange. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(5), 146–153. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i51299

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cheung YL, Wong KT. An assessment of risk and return: Some empirical findings from the Hong Kong stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics. 1992 Jun 1;2(2):105-14.

Östermark R. Empirical evidence on the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in two Scandinavian stock exchanges. Omega. 1991 Jan 1;19(4):223-34.

Żarnowski J, Rutkowska J. Rates of return on portfolios sorted according to the beta coefficient from the CAPM model on the example of shares listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange in the years 1998-2010. Scientific Journals/Polish Economic Society. 2012 (13):249-58.

Harvey CR, Siddique A. Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. The Journal of Finance. 2000 Jun;55(3):1263-95.

Rubinstein ME. The fundamental theorem of parameter-preference security valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1973 Jan;8(1):61-9.

Kraus A, Litzenberger RH. Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. The Journal of Finance. 1976 Sep 1;31(4):1085-100.

Fang H, Lai TY. Co‐kurtosis and capital asset pricing. Financial Review. 1997 May;32(2):293-307.

Dittmar RF. Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preference, and evidence from the cross section of equity returns. The Journal of Finance. 2002 Feb;57(1): 369-403.

Misra D, Vishnani S, Mehrotra A. Four-moment CAPM model: Evidence from the Indian stock market. Journal of Emerging Market Finance. 2019 Apr;18(1_suppl): S137-66.

Fama EF, French KR. The cross‐section of expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance. 1992 Jun;47(2):427-65.

Fama EF, Mac Beth JD. Risk, return, and equilibrium: Empirical tests. Journal of political economy. 1973 May 1;81(3): 607-36.

Mandelbrot B, Taylor HM. On the distribution of stock price differences. Operations Research. 1967 Dec;15(6): 1057-62.

Arditti FD. Risk and the required return on equity. The Journal of Finance. 1967 Mar 1;22(1):19-36.

Fama EF. The behavior of stock-market prices. The Journal of Business. 1965 Jan 1;38(1):34-105.

Conrad J, Dittmar RF, Ghysels E. Ex ante skewness and expected stock returns. The Journal of Finance. 2013 Feb;68(1): 85-124.

Hung DC, Shackleton M, Xu X. CAPM, higher co‐moment and factor models of UK stock returns. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 2004 Jan;31(1‐2):87-112.

Fletcher J, Kihanda J. An examination of alternative CAPM-based models in UK stock returns. Journal of Banking & Finance. 2005 Dec 1;29 (12): 2995-3014.

Galagedera DU, Henry D, Silvapulle P. Empirical evidence on the conditional relation between higher-order systematic co-moments and security returns. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics. 2003 Jan 1:121-37.

Doan MP, Lin CT, Chng M. Higher moments and beta asymmetry: Evidence from A Ustralia. Accounting & Finance. 2014 Sep;54(3):779-807.

Da Silva AC. Modeling and estimating a higher systematic co-moment asset pricing model in the Brazilian stock market. Latin American Business Review. 2006 Jul 20;6(4):85-101.

Teplova T, Shutova E. A higher moment downside framework for conditional and unconditional CAPM in the Russian stock market. Eurasian Economic Review. 2011 Dec;1:157-78.

Chunhachinda P, Dandapani K, Hamid S, Prakash AJ. Portfolio selection and skewness: Evidence from international stock markets. Journal of Banking & Finance. 1997 Feb 1;21(2):143-67.

Bekaert G, Erb CB, Harvey CR, Viskanta TE. Distributional characteristics of emerging market returns and asset allocation. Journal of Portfolio Management. 1998 Jan 31;24(2).

Eftekhari B, Satchell SE. International investors' exposure to risk in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Research. 1999 Mar;22(1):83-106.

Hwang S, Satchell SE. Modelling emerging market risk premia using higher moments. International Journal of Finance & Economics. 1999 Oct;4(4):271-96.

Mitra D, Low SK. A study of risk and return in developed and emerging markets from a Canadian perspective. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business. 1998 Mar 1;34(1):75.

Vishnani S. Asset pricing and co-skewness risk: Evidence from India. Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting. 2013 Jan 1;3(3):208-21.

Asthana A, Ahmed SS. Empirical testing of capital asset pricing model using generalized method of moments in context of Bombay stock exchange. Indian Journal of Natural Sciences. 2023;14(77).

Ghysels E, Plazzi A, Valkanov R. Conditional skewness of stock market returns in developed and emerging markets and its economic fundamentals. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper. 2011 Feb(11-06).

Iváñez ES, Sánchez-Torres PL. Mean-variance-skewness analysis: an application to risk premia in the Spanish stock market. Investigaciones Económicas. 1998; 22(1):5-18.

Wolfle M, Fuss R. A higher-moment CAPM of Korean stock returns. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets. 2010 Jan 1;3(1):24-51.

Doan P, Lin CT, Zurbruegg R. Pricing assets with higher moments: Evidence from the Australian and US stock markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. 2010 Feb 1;20(1):51-67.

Chiao C, Hung K, Srivastava SC. Taiwan stock market and four- moment asset pricing model. Journal of international financial markets, institutions and money. 2003 Oct 1;13(4): 355-81.

Kimball, M. Standard risk aversion. Econometrica, 1993 61(3):589–611.

Harvey, C. and Siddique, A. Autoregressive conditional skewness. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1999;34:456-487.

Rubinstein, M. The Fundamental Theorem of Parameter Preference Security Valuation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 1973;8(1): 61-69.

Homaifar G, Graddy DB. Equity yields in models considering higher moments of the return distribution. Applied Economics. 1988 Mar 1;20(3):325-34.