Exploring the Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Performance: Evidence from Henan's Universities
Yang Di *
Faculty of Business and Accountancy (FOBA), Lincoln University College (LUC), Selangor, Malaysia.
Rozaini Binti Rosli
Faculty of Business and Accountancy (FOBA), Lincoln University College (LUC), Selangor, Malaysia.
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Aims: This study aims to examine the mediating role of organizational commitment in the relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and employee performance within Henan's universities, highlighting the strategic importance of CSR in enhancing organizational effectiveness and employee outcomes.
Study Design: This study utilized a cross-sectional survey methodology to explore the relationships among Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), Organizational Commitment (OC), and Employee Performance (EP) within Henan's higher education sector. A stratified random sampling approach was employed to select faculty and administrative staff from universities engaged in CSR initiatives. The analysis, conducted through Structural Equation Modeling and mediation analysis, aimed to understand both direct and indirect effects of CSR on employee performance, with a particular focus on the mediating role of organizational commitment.
Place and Duration of Study: Zhengzhou University, Henan University, Henan Normal University, Henan Agricultural University and Henan Polytechnic University, in December 2023.
Methodology: The study adopted a quantitative research design using a cross-sectional survey method to explore CSR's impact on organizational commitment and employee performance in Henan's universities. A stratified random sampling strategy was utilized to select faculty and administrative staff from universities engaged in CSR, aiming for a sample size of 328 to ensure statistical significance. Validated scales measured CSR, organizational commitment, and employee performance, with data analysis conducted through Structural Equation Modeling and bootstrapping for mediation effects.
Results: In this study, the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Employee Performance (EP) and Organizational Commitment (OC) within Henan's universities was examined. Findings indicate that CSR positively influences EP both directly and via OC, serving as a mediator. Significant relationships were confirmed: CSR to EP (β=0.433), CSR to OC (β=0.825), and OC to EP (β=0.442), all highly statistically significant (p<0.001). Mediation analysis showed CSR impacts EP through OC, accounting for about 45.73% of the effect. This underscores CSR's dual role in enhancing performance directly and by fostering organizational commitment.
Conclusion: This study not only underscores the pivotal role of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in enhancing employee performance within Henan's universities but also sheds light on the crucial mediating role of Organizational Commitment (OC). The dual pathway through which CSR influences employee performance underlines the significance of integrating CSR into the core strategic management practices of educational institutions. It signals to university administrators and policy-makers that CSR initiatives are not just external obligations but essential strategies for cultivating a committed and high-performing workforce. This realization opens up avenues for universities to re-evaluate and strengthen their CSR strategies, ensuring they are aligned with both organizational goals and employee values. Moreover, it encourages educational institutions to view CSR as a lever for organizational improvement and a bridge to deeper engagement with employees, ultimately contributing to the advancement of educational quality and societal contributions.
Keywords: Corporate social responsibility, organizational commitment, employee performance, higher education, Henan's Universities
How to Cite
Downloads
References
Nicole SJ, Lada S, Ansar R, Abdul Adis AA, Fook LM, Chekima B. Corporate social responsibility and strategic management: A bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability. 2022;14(17):10526.
Aguinis H, Glavas A. On corporate social responsibility, sensemaking, and the search for meaningfulness through work. Journal of Management. 2019;45(3):1057-1086.
Rachman MM. The Impact of Motivation on Performance: The Role of Organizational Commitment. Jurnal Manajemen Teori Dan Terapan. 2022;15(3).
Zhu Q, Zhang Q. Evaluating practices and drivers of corporate social responsibility: The Chinese context. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;100:315-324.
Carroll AB. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stake-holders. Business Horizons. 1991;34(4): 39-48.
Carroll AB, Shabana KM. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010;12(1);85-105.
Freeman RE. Strategic Management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman; 1984.
Hayter CS, Cahoy DR. Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization. 2018; 16(1):12-34.
Aithal PS, Aithal S. How to increase emotional infrastructure of higher education institutions. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences (IJMTS). 2023;8(3):356-394.
Glavas A. Corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Enabling employees to employ more of their whole selves at work. Frontiers in Psychology. 2016;7:796.
Ashforth BE, Mael F. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review. 1989;14(1):20-39.
Xiong F, Shao Y, Fan H, Xie Y. Analysis of the Motivation behind Corporate Social Responsibility Based on the csQCA Approach. Sustainability. 2023;15(13):10622.
Peterson DK. The relationship between perceptions of corporate citizenship and organizational commitment. Business and Society. 2018;57(3):599-626.
Meyer JP, Allen NJ. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review. 1991;1(1):61-89.
Allen NJ, Meyer JP. The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1990;63(1):1-18.
Asif M, Qing M, Hwang J, Shi H. Ethical leadership, affective commitment, work engagement, and creativity: Testing a multiple mediation approach. Sustainability.2019;11(16):4489.
Gitau AN, Monari DG. Determinants of employee commitment in constitutional commissions in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business and Change Management. 2019;6(2):2065-2078.
Ramalho Luz CMD, Luiz de Paula S, De Oliveira LMB. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and their possible influences on intent to turnover. Revista de Gestão. 2018;25(1):84-101.
Grego-Planer D. The relationship between organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behaviors in the public and private sectors. Sustainability. 2019;11(22):6395.
Albrecht SL, Bakker AB, Gruman JA, Macey WH, Saks AM. Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. 2015;2(1):7-35.
Lee M, Kim B. Effect of employee experience on organizational commitment: Case of South Korea. Behavioral Sciences. 2023;13(7):521.
Zhu JJ, Liu Z, Shen X, Shan L, Zhang X. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the service industry: A systematic review. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2023;11:1150681.
Manzoor SR, Ullah A, Ullah R, Khattak A, Han H, Yoo S. Micro CSR intervention towards employee behavioral and attitudinal outcomes: A parallel mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10(1):1-14.
Peng MYP, Liang Z, Fatima I, Wang Q, Rasheed MI. The nexus between empowering leadership, job engagement and employee creativity: Role of creative self-efficacy in the hospitality industry. Kybernetes; 2023.
Alkhadra WA, Khawaldeh S, Aldehayyat J. Relationship of ethical leadership, organizational culture, corporate social responsibility and organizational performance: A test of two mediation models. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, (ahead-of-print); 2022.
Aguinis H, Glavas A. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management. 2012; 38(4):932-968.
Wang X, Liu J. Chinese universities’ social education: A historical perspective (1912–1945). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10(1):1-11.
Shah KU. National environmental regulatory systems for the management of environmental impacts in small island jurisdictions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 2023;64: 101326.
Tett RP, Meyer JP. Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path analyses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychology. 1993;46(2):259-293.
Lin WC, Chang CW. The influence of Chinese scholars on global research. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):18410.
Atherton G, Crosling G, Shuib M, Azizan SN. Internationalisation and transformation of higher education in ASEAN countries: A distinctive emerging approach. The Journal of Social Sciences Research. 2018; 540-553.
Rhoads RA, Wang X, Shi X, Chang Y. China's rising research universities: A new era of global ambition. JHU Press; 2014.
Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications; 2009.
Turker D. Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study; 2009.
Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 1993;71–98.
Hai JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education; 2010.
Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis; 2009.
Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2015;43(1):115-135.
Hair JF, LDS Gabriel M, Silva DD, Braga S. Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal. 2019;54:490-507.
Chen C, Vanclay F. Transnational universities, host communities and local residents: social impacts, university social responsibility and campus sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2021;22(8):88-107.
Moggi S. Sustainability reporting, universities and global reporting initiative applicability: A still open issue. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal. 2023;14(4):699-742.
Gond JP, El Akremi A, Swaen V, Babu N. The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person‐centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2017;38(2): 225-246.
Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In Political psychology, Psychology Press. 2004; 276-293.
Tan SHE, Chin GF. Generational effect on nurses’ work values, engagement, and satisfaction in an acute hospital. BMC Nursing. 2023;22(1):88.
Tafolli F, Grabner-Kräuter S. Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility and organizational corruption: empirical evidence from Kosovo. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2020;20(7):1349-1370.
Aguilera RV, Rupp DE, Williams CA, Ganapathi J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review. 2007; 32(3):836-863.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;41(4):1149-1160.
Field A. An adventure in statistics: The reality enigma. Sage; 2022.
Meyer JP, Stanley DJ, Herscovitch L, Topolnytsky L. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2002;61(1):20-52.
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. Educational reform and development plan for the 2010-2020 decade. Beijing: Author; 2010.